<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>opinion on QRL: The Quantum Resistant Ledger</title><link>https://www.theqrl.org/categories/opinion/</link><description>Recent content in opinion on QRL: The Quantum Resistant Ledger</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.theqrl.org/categories/opinion/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Quantum-Safe Bitcoin Without a Soft Fork? It's Clever. But Read the Fine Print</title><link>https://www.theqrl.org/blog/quantumsafe-bitcoin-without-a-soft-fork-its-clever-but-read-the-fine-print/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.theqrl.org/blog/quantumsafe-bitcoin-without-a-soft-fork-its-clever-but-read-the-fine-print/</guid><description>A new paper from StarkWare presents a scheme for quantum-safe Bitcoin transactions using nothing but existing consensus rules. It is genuinely inventive. It is also, by its authors&amp;rsquo; own admission, a last resort.</description><enclosure url="https://www.theqrl.org/content/blog/2026/quantumsafe-bitcoin-without-a-soft-fork-its-clever-but-read-the-fine-print/images/header.png" length="1236711" type="image/png"/></item></channel></rss>